Page 10 - 05
P. 10

ENVIROMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF MARINE 9
                    INVASIVE SPECIES CARRIED BY BALAST WATER

The amount of the ballast water coming from different ecosystems and regions to Turkey was
shown in Table 5. Our goal was to make prioritization of the invasive species observed in
Turkish coasts which indicates us the most dangerous routes and ships, therefore limited funds
for supervision of ships can be allocated accurately. For this goal a comparable method needed
to be chosen. Therefore the frequency factor is taken as;

            Total Amount of Ballast Water Carried from Native Seas
F.F = —————————————————————————

             Total Amount of Ballast Water Carried from All Seas

Table 5. Amount of Ballast Water Carried to Coasts of Turkey, 2006-2010 [12]

Seas                Amount of Ballast Water ( Tones)
East Pacific                             785646
South Atlantic                          1479877
Caspian Sea                               22083
Indian Ocean                            1746505
Persian Gulf                             669718
Red Sea                                  751193
Northwest Atlantic                      2265604
Northwest Pacific                       1396405
Northeast Atlantic                      3997390
Northeast Pacific                        278385
North Sea                                 7280
South Pacific                            181116
Total Amount
                                       13581202

2.5 Risk Ranking

All individual invasive species were examined for ecological impact factor and frequency
factor. After determination of those values for every single invasive species, a risk index
number assigned by multiplying ecological impact factor and frequency factor

3. Results and Discussion

Risk index numbers for each marine invaders in the coasts of Turkey was calculated and
presented in Table 7. As an example, detailed risk index calculation for Mnemiopsis leidyi
which is the invasive species with the highest risk index number is shown in table 7, was given.
Detailed ecological impact score calculation can be seen in Table 6 and the risk index
calculations were performed according to the following equations.

                                                                    Sayı 5, 2016 GiDB|DERGi
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15