Page 22 - 01
P. 22

20 H.AKYILDIZ

                    3. Results and discussions
                    3.1 Free surface elevation
                    Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8 and Fig.9 denote the snapshots of the liquid motion including
                    the free surface deformation and the velocity at regular intervals during one period (T) of the
                    rolling tank for different baffle heights. In the case of the unbaffled tank, the liquid sloshing is
                    enough to reach to the top wall of the tank after impacting on the side walls of the tank as shown
                    in Fig. 6(a-d). When the tank has the vertical baffle or the T-shape baffle with the height of hB /
                    h = 0.2 and hB / h = 0.4, the pattern of liquid sloshing is almost similar to the case of the
                    unbaffled tank as shown in Fig. 7(a-d) and Fig. 8(a-d). T-shape baffle represents the shallow
                    water effects and the free surface behavior is getting stable slowly due to the wave breaking and
                    the inertial forces. As the vertical baffle height increases continuously, the rolling motion of the
                    liquid becomes slightly weaker due to the blockage effects of the baffles on the liquid
                    convection. Additionally, the free surface behavior is getting stable and the inertial forces are
                    not enough to propel the liquid to reach to the top wall of the tank as shown in Fig. 9, Fig. 10
                    and Fig. 11.
                    In the snapshots of the velocity vectors for one period (T) of the rolling motion of the tank for
                    the various hB / h, the velocity vectors near the left wall moves upward after the liquid impacts
                    on the left wall. The vortex almost starts to form left behind the vertical baffle and T-shape
                    baffle represents the shallow water effects. At this instant, the liquid shows the roof impact on
                    the left top corner of the tank. This pattern is almost a reverse result when the tank moves right
                    side.
                    As the vertical baffle height increases, the blockage effect of the vertical baffle on the liquid
                    convection is predominant to the tip vortex. the strength of the vortex by liquid flow separation
                    from the vertical baffle tip become weaker. The value of the maximum free surface elevation
                    also keeps decreasing.

                          (a) (b)

GiDB|DERGi Sayı 1, 2014
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27