Page 40 - 02
P. 40

40 Y.A. SOYADI, Y.A. SOYADI, Y.A. SOYADI ve Y.A. SOYADI

                         Table 4. Collision and contact ranking

Accident                 Berthing / Entering /  Fish             Fish       Dry dock,
Subcategory                                                      handling,  Maintenance
                         Unberthing leaving port handling,       Open sea
Starting up                                                                 F4S1 = 4
Manoeuvring                                     Coastal          F3S1 = 3   F4S1 = 4
Shutdown                                                         F6S3 = 8   F4S1 = 4
Abnormal operation       F4S1 = 4  F4S1 = 4     F4S1 = 4         F5S3 = 7   F3S1 = 3
Anchoring                                                        F6S3 = 8   F2S1 = 2
                         F5S2 = 6  F6S2 = 7     F6S3 = 8         F2S1 = 2

                         F4S2 = 5  F4S1 = 4     F5S3 = 7

                         F3S1 = 3  F5S2 = 6     F6S3 = 8

                         F5S1 = 5  F3S1 = 3     F3S1 = 3

Having identified the high-risk areas and ranking them in order of importance, the next step
would be to make recommendations to manage / minimize the risk for the associated hazards.
This could be achieved by the „brainstorming‟ method. The decision would be dependent on
several factors such as cost, availability and effectiveness. The formal safety analysis can be
further developed to make it more elaborate and complete by using the MCA or IMO type of
formal safety assessment for a generic vessel.

5.1 Fault Tree Analysis

The availability of data and quality of information will affect the degree of uncertainty.
However, provided that reliabilty models are based on rational principles, the lack of data might
not lessen too much the usefulness of the model. Since fault tree approach provides a
systematic procedure for identifying faults, it has found a growing use in many engineering
fields. On the other hands, fault tree analysis has disadvantages and advantages as follows:

Disadvantages:

         The first major disadvantage is oversight and omission.
         The second one is the binary assumption for the component state, i.e. failure or success.
         The third one is related to the assumption that all basic events are considered non-
         repairable.

Advantages:

         The first major advantage is the capability of displaying the relative importance of each
         component.
         Secondly, minimal cut sets are used to identify the weakest points of the system.
         The third one is that the importance levels can be found to rank each component.

GiDB|DERGi Sayı 1, 2015
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45