Page 37 - 033
P. 37

36 M.S. MERDİVENCİ, A.G. AVCI, B. BARLAS

Table 10: VDV of Mti700 in each axis and totals for both trials.

VDV     Trial 1         Trial 2                  Total
X-Axis  1080.886        541.474                  1097.52
Y-axis  2927.196        382.441                  2927.41
Z-axis  8438.258        3742.779                 8518.75
Total   10.5623         8.265                    11.44

Table 11: VDV of Mti200 in each axis and totals for both trials.

VDV     Trial 1         Trial 2                  Total
X-Axis  272.806         293.322                  337.28
Y-axis  107.436         299.165                  300.40
Z-axis  3031.841        313.885                  3031.93
Total   7.643           5.487                    8.11

        Table 12: VDV in each axis and totals for both trials.

        VDV Trial 1-Avg Trial 2-Avg Total-Avg

        X-Axis 1097.52  337.28            1099.96

        Y-axis 2927.41  300.40            2927.49

        Z-axis 8518.75  3031.93           8552.72

        Total 11.44     8.11              12.10

                     4. Conclusions

                     This paper has highlighted the Vibration Dose Values (VDV) that can be expected on a car, an
                     ambulance and a RIB high speed marine craft, and how these values relate to limits set by
                     current standards and legislation. By comparing the impacts encountered to the boat motions, it
                     has been possible to determine which are the more dominant axes and show that it is not

GiDB|DERGi Sayı 3, 2015
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42