Page 25 - 033
P. 25

24 M.S. MERDİVENCİ, A.G. AVCI, B. BARLAS

                     Allen et al. [2] studied on the shocks and the impacts encountered on small high-speed craft
                     exceed the limits set for safe working practice according to current standards. They set out to
                     highlight the vibration dose values that can be expected during typical transits onboard high-
                     speed craft and attempts to clarify some of the controversy currently surrounding vibration dose
                     measurement in such circumstances. Dawkins et al. [3] investigated the effectiveness of using
                     fractals for generating artificial terrains which can be used for vehicle simulations. Shoop et al.
                     [4] explored a methodology that could quantify the impact of various vehicles, tires, driving
                     speeds and maneuvers on the snow road conditions. Basic maneuvers were used to isolate the
                     impact of turning, acceleration, braking and speed using spirals, circles, and straight-line testing
                     on a flat, smooth snow pavement. Fallah-Fini et al. [5] discussed a dynamic efficiency
                     measurement model for evaluating the performance of high way maintenance policies where the
                     inter-temporal dependencies between consumption of inputs and realization of outputs were
                     explicitly captured. Chan et al. [6] utilized the Tennessee Pavement Management System and
                     Accident History Database to investigate the relationship between accident frequency and
                     pavement distress variables. Shah et al. [7] evaluated two methods for priority ranking of road
                     maintenance; ranking based on subjective rating and ranking based on economic indicator.
                     Erdogan et al. [8] focused on the development and experimental evaluation of a novel adaptive
                     feed forward vibration cancellation based friction estimation system. Nila et al. [9] focused on
                     the hydrodynamic impact of bodies onto the water surface which is a problem of great
                     importance in the design of off-shore and naval structures (wave energy converters, off-shore
                     platforms, high speed boats, etc). Wines [10] focused on an issue for high speed craft that they
                     in general are subject to high levels of vibration. Such vibrations may be harmful to the human
                     body on-board and may reduce the situational awareness. An 11m hull RIB has been
                     investigated experimentally for very high Froude numbers. Having recognized the problems that
                     will most likely occur in calm water and in waves, the actual RIB was instrumented and a series
                     of tests were conducted regarding vibration and maneuverability. Wertheim et al. [11] tested the
                     traditional assumption that sea sickness is uniquely provoked by heave motion characteristics,
                     with pitch and roll movements being ineffective. In an experiment with a ship motion simulator,
                     subjects were exposed to pitch and roll motions in combination with rather weak heave motions
                     that have no motion sickness inducing potential.

                     Turner and Griffin [12] identified personal and environmental factors influencing individual
                     susceptibility to motion sickness during road transport. A questionnaire survey of 3256 coach
                     travelers was conducted. Diaz et al. [13] presents the design of a monovariable robust controller
                     with quantitative feedback theory (QFT) for reducing the vertical movement on a high-speed
                     ferry. Kim et al. [14] investigated the response of the human body to the amounts, frequencies,
                     directions, and exposure times of exerted forces. Processes have been developed to standardize
                     these factors, and the typical examples are ISO 2631-1 and BS 6841, which are related to
                     whole-body vibration and ISO 5349-1, which is related to hand transmitted vibration. Ahn [15]
                     focused on discomfort of vertical whole-body shock-type vibration in the frequency range of 0.5
                     to 16 Hz. In this experimental study, various shock signals were systematically produced using
                     the response of a one degree-of-freedom vibration model to hanning-windowed half-sine force
                     input. Zhao and Schindler [16] investigated the evaluation of the WBV (Whole-body-vibration)
                     exposure using ISO 2631-1 and ISO2631-5 standards and the results were compared in their
                     study. Turkay and Akcay [17] utilized the response of the vehicle to profile imposed excitation
                     with randomly varying traverse velocity and variable vehicle forward velocity with using the
                     quarter car model. Misol et al. [18] investigated the different active structural acoustic control
                     (ASAC) concepts for the reduction of interior noise in an automobile passenger compartment.
                     For the control experiments, a medium-class test car was used, which had been equipped with

GiDB|DERGi Sayı 3, 2015
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30